The day after the elections the usual writing takes
place. Many, many articles everywhere speculating what
will or will not happen because of the choices that
voters have made. And then there is a second round of
articles that agree with or disagree with the first
round of articles. This is understandable because
elections have consequences. Who is your neighbor?
Now, four states passed laws that will allow for legal
marriage to take place between people of the same sex.
Marriage, for age upon age, in almost every part of the
world has been considered to be a permanent union
between a man and a woman and this natural type of
bonding has been seen as an expression of natural law.
Already Jewish law considered marriage a gift from God,
a model of love and faithfulness that was symbolic of
the covenant between God and Israel. With the coming of
Jesus Christ, marriage is placed on a much higher plane.
It is now not just a gift from God, it is a sacrament, a
source of grace for a wife and a husband, a means by
which people can grow not just in natural love, but in
their genuine love for each other they bring one another
into a deeper love for God. And that love, and the
effects of that spiritual union pour out into family
life, and from family life out into the world.
The Christian view of marriage has had a profound impact
on the world. And to be brief, I'll just talk about the
Western world here. It's hard to imagine Roman society
in some ways, but it was in many areas similar to other
pagan societies in Europe. The man, the husband, the
father had an absolute right to the lives of his wife
and children, and if he had money he also had a right to
the lives of his slaves. Women had very limited rights.
Poor women, which is to say most women, had no rights at
all. Children could be killed after birth if the father
wished it, and those deemed undesirable could be left to
die out in the fields, or killed directly. No laws
existed to forbid the brutal beatings of wives or
children. No laws demanded a man stay with and support
his family. All permitted under Roman law and most forms
of tribal law in Europe. As the Christian faith spread
and grew throughout Europe, so did the situation for
marriage and family life improve. Husbands were to love
their wives as they loved themselves and wives their
husbands. Children were a blessing from God and
therefore contraception was not permitted and abortion,
infant and child-killing were acts of murder not only in
the eyes of God but also in the laws of the land.
Although cultures often still tended to favor the male's
position over his wife in certain areas, the teaching of
Christ was clear about the equal spiritual value and
worth of each spouse, and their children as well.
Nothing, nothing, nothing else elevated the status of
women and children in Europe except the Gospel of
Christ, which was upheld by most all people in Europe
and the Americas, until today. Who is your neighbor?
With the four states that passed laws allowing for
so-called same-sex marriage, it is good to ask how this
monumental change in the way we see ourselves as a
nation has come to pass. Is this vote based on some idea
about natural law? Of course not. And how strange that
in an era where one of the great virtues is to live and
dress using natural, organic food, clothing and
life-style, all natural is all best, except in marriage
and family. And who is your neighbor?
So what is the reason for creating a new category for
marriage? It's not based on natural law, it's not based
on Christian teaching (not to mention a whole bunch of
other religions). So what is it based on? Most often you
will hear the idea that it is based on equality. People
attracted to the same sex should be allowed to marry
people of the same sex, despite natural law, despite the
teachings of Christ. That's equality, because we say its
equality. So friends I have to ask you seriously what
other types of arrangements between people that are
currently illegal might also claim that they are not
being treated equally and fairly. And who is your
neighbor?
Twenty years ago 8% of Americans had no religious
affiliation. This 8% would contain atheists, agnostics
and even people who believed in God. They just didn't
really bother with Him. Now this number is 20%. Twenty
percent of our country believing, or not believing in
God, has no particular religious affiliation. They are
called the "Nones" as in "not any of the above
religions." In a USA Today article, one of these
"Nones," a 21-year-old student body president at
California Lutheran University said, "I like the
ambiguity of going without a label. I prefer to stress
the importance of acting with compassion
rather than choosing a pre-determined set of
beliefs." Well, what if God has predetermined this set
of beliefs because He is our Creator and we are made to
live according to these truths? And how do you know if
you are acting with compassion? What set of rules or
guidance outside of your own ideas will guide you in
your compassion? If Grandpa is sick and you think it
would be more compassionate to end his life, even though
he wants to live, should your compassion for him be
accepted? What if Grandpa learns of your plans to knock
him off and hires a hit man to kill you before you can
kill him, because he wouldn't want you to go through the
rest of your days suffering as a Grandpa-killer. He
feels it would be the compassionate thing to do, because
your quality of life would be harmed greatly once you
become a murderer, and he's already lived most of his
life so taking you out first would not bother him as
long at it would bother you if you were the killer.
This is a problem with the "Nones." They tend not to
recognize any objective moral authority outside of their
own thoughts and ideas. Can you see any potentially bad
outcomes when people decide that they are their own
source of moral and ethical wisdom? Four states have
voted for same sex marriage. What harm could come from
that? And the "Nones" were a major force in those
elections, along with, sadly, plenty of Christians. And
who is your neighbor?
The "Nones" are our neighbors. Christians who have
dropped the orthodox Gospel are our neighbors. People
who are non-practicing Catholics, non-practicing
Orthodox, non-practicing Protestants, and non-practicing
Jews are our neighbors. And it is harder for us to stand
up for the truth. And it is more—much
more—difficult to publically live as a follower of
Christ when people, even your own family members, may
disagree with you, accuse you, even perhaps revile you,
and tell you to keep your religious ideas to yourself,
because everyone has to decide for themselves what is
right and wrong.
They are our neighbors. We should never let them down by
just passing by them without a word. If they have been
beaten up with false values, mugged by moral weakness,
bruised with a misguided sense of compassion, wounded by
the prince of this world and left in a ditch they
thought was filled with wisdom and superior values and a
genuine sense of secular glory, how can we keep silent
when we have such good news to share? If we love our
neighbor, we must always be willing to share the truth,
even in the face of opposition and ridicule and
contempt, because our Savior suffered those same things
for us, and for our neighbors. We should never be afraid
to offer to others the healing truth which is in Christ
our Lord.