I was thinking about the three characters in today's
parable and how they saw themselves and their lives. Two
of them show absolutely no change in their outlook
during the course of the story. The older son is
unhappy, angry, resentful, materialistic and perhaps
even greedy. He obviously is not happy that his younger
brother has returned home safely, which shows how much
he cares for his brother. He insults his father
continually by never calling him "father" as any good
Jewish son would do. He'd rather be off with his friends
than his brother or dad, and that shows how much he
cares for his father. Nothing that belongs to him has
been taken away and yet he acts as though he has been
robbed. It would be wrong to think he is the dutiful son
who stayed home to work the farm and is now justified in
his anger when his brother returns. That's not what is
going on here. We are meant to see him as one who has
little love for father or brother, and that's not
something new. It has been his attitude for a long, long
time. There is no change in the older son. He is no
better from the beginning of the story to the end.
Next we have the father. It had to have been hard on him
to discover that his younger son wanted to leave him,
not for a vacation, not for a period of time, but
presumably forever. Of course he knew his son and how he
thought, and it is very likely that he knew the boy
would use his fortune for partying and good times. He
probably worried about the kind of people that are
always attracted to someone who is willing to pay the
bill and I'm thinking he must have worried about his
son's safety, and even for his life. A sad thing for a
loving father to think about, and even more sad to think
his son did not want to live with him, and most sad, as
he waved good-bye from the front of the family home, to
wonder if he would ever see his boy again, alive or
dead.
We are certainly meant to see him as kind, generous and
very loving father. Notice there is not one word of
recrimination when his son returns home. He doesn't ask
how the boy lived, he doesn't ask for apologies or for
anything else. He is simply glad he is home safe and
sound and whatever the boy may have done is left behind
in the father's joy at his return. The love he shows
this son is the same love he shows his other son as he
goes out to try and beg him to change his attitude. And
what does he want for the older son? He wants him to be
happy! He wants him to be glad in his family, and
despite the abuse this son hands to him right to his
face, the father still begs him to find a way to
celebrate with his family. The father never changes from
beginning to end. But unlike the older son, his steady
character is not marked by sin and selfishness, but
rather by his enduring love for his sons. He has always
loved them this way, and despite the faults and failings
of both sons he loves them still. No change.
And then there is the youngest son who, not caring for
family, went out into the world not to seek
his fortune, but to spend his share of his
father's fortune. We don't know exactly whether
he spent his money on prostitutes or gambling or
expensive food and drink. We don't even know if he was
snorting cocaine. But he went through that money rather
quickly and from being a good-time Goliath, he rapidly
fell into the role of down and dirty Daniel. Starving
and slopping those un-kosher pigs, he was in misery, and
this condition, this situation, this radical change in
his life gave him a clear mind to see the truth of what
kind of person he was. Packing with the porkers was the
proof of his spiritual poverty. Now he saw clearly. He
was so miserable that he had to do something, and with
this new clarity of who he was as a person, the truth
about himself in the plain light of day he was forced to
do some thing. He could have turned to evil and
crime, but he chooses to live for what is better. It's
almost as though his father's love is like grace,
calling him back to a better life, and that is what he
chooses. What a changed man he is as he begs his dad's
forgiveness, telling him the only thing he desires or
needs is to be close again to his dad. He is the only
character who changes in the parable and it is a change
from sin to virtue, from fleeting, false pleasure to
enduring peace and loving contentment.
So then: we are not bad to the bone like son #1, nor are
we like the absolute loving father, but somewhere in
between, more like the Prodigal. One of the reasons the
Church offers us the season of Great Lent is so that by
changing our condition in life a bit, through extra
prayer, fasting, almsgiving, and paying more attention
to our spiritual life in a different way than the rest
of the year, we set up the conditions to see ourselves
more as we are, and to see our lives with greater
clarity and honesty. Without having to be starving,
without having to feed pigs we can change our own
condition through a Lenten-life style to better see
where we are in life and how we are doing with life, and
is that life a life in Christ, and if not Christian
enough, then we can make a decision for something
better. We can ask our Father for pardon and accept
whatever work we may need to do so we can lift up our
heads not in shame or disgrace, but lift up our heads in
peace and God's grace.
Unlike the Prodigal we are not forced to consider the
status of our life or the state of our soul by external
forces we cannot control. We are not forced into harsh
conditions that will reveal the truth about ourselves.
Instead, we are invited to create our own change in
conditions through the Lenten lifestyle so that we can
choose to make those changes which will bring us closer
to our heavenly Father and bring greater love to this
world, even as we accept more eagerly and more wisely
our Father's love for us. The Church invites us for
seven weeks to change or alter our condition on the
outside, so that we can see more clearly what
is going on inside. Then, with a better
understanding of who we are and how we
are, then we can better choose which direction we want
to go. It's an invitation to the pig sty, so to speak,
to see if we are wallowing in things that are harmful to
us, and to give us perspective to better see what our
Father is offering to us. We are not forced;
we are not forced to go there. We are not
forced; we are not forced to change. If we truly believe
we are living the best our life can offer to us, then I
guess there is no need for a Lenten lifestyle. But if we
believe there is more to life than how we are already
living, then let us consider changing our external
situation this Lent so we can examine ourselves and
change to be living more freely, and living more
graciously. Christ, Himself, will show us the way home
to the Father.