This past week I was reading what some of the Church
Fathers had to say about today's Gospel of the Man Born
Blind, and of course they had some great observations.
So pardon me today if I don't share just one main theme
with you. Instead I'd like to tell you about several of
their ideas on this text. One comment really surprised
me. After the man is thrown out of the synagogue by the
Pharisees, Jesus finds him and asks him if he believes
in the Son of Man. Here's what Theodore of Mopsuestia
said: "The blind man, recognizing Jesus'
voice—remember he had not seen Him yet— said
'and who is He, sir? Tell me so that I may believe in
Him.' With good reason, he thought that the one who had
given him sight even though he was beyond hope could
also show him the Son of God." I have read and heard
this Gospel so many, many times over the years and yet,
for some reason I never stopped to realize that the man
who was cured did not recognize Jesus by appearance
here, because he did see Him after he had been cured,
until I read this piece by Theodore. Although it may be
very obvious to you, it was not to me. So there you are,
as you suspected, I am not Dick Tracy — I am more
like Inspector Clouseau of the Pink Panther fame.
St. John Chrysostom explains why Jesus made mud and put
it on the man's eyes. He says that Jesus did this so
that everyone along the street would see this blind man
making his way to the pool of Siloam, and they would pay
attention to him because of the mud on his eyes,
wondering why anyone would put mud on their eyes, and
they would remember him. Then, after his cure, with his
sight restored, when they saw him healed they would be
witnesses to the glory of God. So that which was
earthly, in a literal sense, the mud, would lead them to
realize they had then witnessed the divine power of
Christ in this miracle.
Then there is St. Augustine, who also speaks of the
Blind man's second meeting with Jesus. He says that the
man had washed his face at Siloam but he had not yet
washed the face of his heart. Jesus asks him if he
believes in the Son of God, and the man asks, who He is,
so that he may believe in Him. St. Augustine says,
"He could already see him, certainly with his eyes, but with his heart?" Not yet. Wait for it; he will see Him in a moment. Jesus answered him, "I am, I Who am talking to you." Did he hesitate? He washed the face of his heart immediately. After all Siloam was talking to him, which is translated as 'the One Who is sent.' So Jesus Himself was Siloam. The man blind in his heart approached, heard, believed, worshipped, washed his face and he saw."St. Augustine talks about these two washings, one which involves a physical action and the second which involves an interior washing away of anything which blinds us to Jesus. "The sacrament had already taken place in his eyes, but the benefit of grace had not yet been achieved in his heart." And that word "sacrament" made me think of Chloe's baptism today, where she will be washed in "Siloam," where she will put on Christ and receive the gift of divine life through the waters and the seed of faith is given to her, the sight of the face of Christ is within her life. But from here on out it will, in time, become her responsibility to respond to the voice of Christ, to hear and recognize His voice, to see Him and know Him and to believe that truly He is the Son of God. She will be washed in Siloam, but then it will be necessary throughout her life, as it is for all of us, to continue to do as St. Augustine said: to approach Jesus, to hear Him, to believe what He says, to worship Him, and to always be ready to have her heart washed clean, as we should be ready to have our hearts washed clean.