Jesus says in today's Gospel that if anyone is ashamed
of Him and His doctrine, that He will be ashamed of that
person when He returns at the Second Coming. So then,
are many of us ashamed of Christ and His teaching?
That's a very strong question, I think. Are we ashamed
of Christ or of our faith? I can't believe any one here
is ashamed of Christ, and I doubt that anyone here is
ashamed of their faith. But does that mean we are
totally free from any blame at all in this area of
concern?
A few Sundays ago, I thought I would watch the first
program of the new version of the television series,
"Cosmos." Because I kind of like that science/space
stuff. And then they start in to talk about Giordano
Bruno, a 16th century philosopher and sometime science
dabbler. According to the TV show, Bruno, who believed
the universe was infinite and that there was life in
outer space, was burned at the stake by the Catholic
Church for being a man of science. Uggghh! The same old
lies repeated again and again and here again. I was so
mad I just turned it off. I don't want to talk about
Bruno's case here but rather to show how, once again,
misinformation is put out to the public to show that the
greatest enemy to science and learning is the Catholic
Church.
But what kind of science does "Cosmos" preach? "The
universe is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be."
But that is not a scientific statement because it cannot
be proven. We are expected to take it on faith, because,
"scientists" tell us so. Or at least a couple of
scientists say so. It is not so surprising to learn that
the man behind this TV series is an atheist.
Then I began reading a book by Frank Sheed called,
"Knowing God," and I came across a passage where he
talks about sanity and society. He writes, "Sanity means
seeing what's there and planning life accordingly. And
as a society, ours does not see the major part of reality at all,
therefore it does not correctly see the minor part it is
aware of, and so it shapes its activities as though this
mis-seen fraction of reality was the whole of reality.
Secular ethics means deciding our actions as though
there was no God . . . To act without full vision is a
formula for chaos. And in chaos, we live, exhibited by
every newspaper we read . . . ." He goes on to talk
about this kind of society's lack of sanity because it
refuses to see the big picture, which includes God, and
only wants to consider the smaller portion of reality,
the material world. That's all you need to consider when
you are thinking about life. And Sheed says this is a
kind of insanity, a failure to see the truth as it is,
and the failure then to try and live in that truth as it
is, and the failure then to try and live in that truth.
Does this mean that our society is evil and rotten to
the core? No, because there is still much good in our
society. But the problem is what effect our society has
on us, as believers, since it only deals with part of
reality.
Sheed writes that our society, which has lost contact
with God, presents itself and all its teachings, ideals
and goals as sophisticated, enlightened, educated and
superior in every way especially in its rationality and
inclusiveness. Only a fanatic would question the
conclusions it presents to us.
Sheed writes," Hardly any of us realize how much we are
creatures of our time. Its assumptions tend to be ours,
without even a question stirring in us. And there is a
continual seeping in from it which makes for a kind of
damping and discoloration even of values we hold
sacred." Of course, should we be surprised that we are
under a certain pressure to go with society, to go with
the majority, wherever it wants to take us?
Sheed continues, "Fanatic is the word . . . the Catholic
(person) can be consciously embarrassed at his
difference. There are those who feel out of step if they
have not made the mysteries of revelation truly their
own . . . . The temptation is to try to get into step
with everybody else while somehow hanging on to the
truths. Short of denying them, there is a kind of
scaling down and shading off, a resolute switching of
the mind away from doctrines at which the world would
raise an eyebrow. At all costs, one must not be a
fanatic." You might be surprised to learn that these
words were written not just a few years ago but in 1966.
And that should not surprise us, really because it was a
problem 2000 years ago when St. Paul wrote to the Church
in Rome and said, "Do not conform yourself to this age,
but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you
may discern the will of God, what is good and pleasing
and perfect." (Rom. 12:2)
Sheed says we ought to pay great attention to what we
believe and how we think and act and conduct our lives
so that we move through this world as people who hear
the voice of Christ and are willing to obey, to learn
and to love the truth of Him Who is our Savior. He is
the source of our reality and the wisdom that does not
change with the seasons or the desires of any time or
age. Other drums are always beating and telling us we
need to march to their rhythm or else we will be out of
step with the rest of society. But our vocation cannot
be to march along with whoever had the loudest drum, or
the biggest parade. Our vocation is to pick up the cross
and march after Christ because we see that reality is
infinitely greater than the cosmos and the entire
material world just as we are much, much more than just
creatures in the flesh doomed to decay and death. We may
indeed be creatures, but we have an eye, and an ear and
a love for our Creator, Who loves us, and offers us His
own divine life.
I believe Sheed is correct when he says that just as we
examine our consciences from time to time, we should
also examine our thoughts and our beliefs to be certain
that we have not allowed some of the insanity of the
world to seep into our lives and the way we conduct
ourselves in this world. Jesus said that His sheep only
hear his voice and they will not follow someone else.
May we be those sheep who only hear His voice, so that
we never allow ourselves to go astray.